Week 1

By week 1 I finally got a part of the hardest thing regarding this project: a way of maintaining the requirements for the bears easily.

To help myself with that, I created a PackageRequirement class. Now each bear can have a REQUIREMENTS tuple made of instances of the PackageRequirement class.

To automatize working, I worked on two separate things:

  • creating a “multiple“ method, which helps you instantiate multiple instances of that class instead of calling out the same class again all over and over again
  • creating subclasses, such as PythonRequirement and NPMRequirement, which have the manager already set to “pip“, respectively “npm“.

These classes receive 3 arguments: manager, package name and version.

However, there’s more: you can also avoid specifying the version, and this way, the latest will automatically be specified.

On the other hand, I am working on a bearUploader tool. This will upload a MockBear (which I chose to be cpplintbear for the basic functionality it provides) to provide continuous integration. This is still work in progress, as the tool only creates a setup.py file for the bear right now, but it’s going to be done the next week.

So for the next week: More on the bearUploader tool!


Europython & GSoC start

Europython & GSoC start

So this weekend has 2 huge things. First of all, as most may know, this weekend announces the end of the Community Bonding period. This means that the coding session begins on Monday. However, this is not the only thing that happens. Two days ago I just found out that I’m going to be sponsored by Europython with a ticket there!

What is Europython?

EuroPython was the first major Python programming language community conference ever organized by volunteers. It started 2002 in Charleroi, Belgium, which attracted over 200 attendees.

It now is the largest European Python conference (1200+ participants in 2014 and in 2015), the second largest Python conference world-wide and a meeting reference for all European programmers, students and companies interested in the Python programming language.


I have already bought tickets and I’m planning to go there this year. It will be held from 17 to 24 July and it’s probably gonna be one of the most amazing experiences in my life. I’m going there with the amazing coalaians that I’ve been working with on the coala project (see https://github.com/coala-analyzer/coala for more information about what coala is) including (hopefully) my mentor. I’m so hyped about the conferences, the talks, the workshops and especially the coding & drinking sessions I will be having alongside my co-stayers.

Community bonding

So for this part of the project, called “Community bonding”, I have to prepare the things for my project. What is a better way of doing this besides talking to my mentor? Probably none. Today I had my first project-only related online conversation on Skype, and it was amazing. I got to talk to this man that is going to help me finish my project throughout this summer.

What do I have to do?

I have to get my stuff done in this pre-coding part. And what does it involve? Well, as written in my proposal, I will have to settle two things:

  • how will I make the installation as great as possible, so basically the user experience must be amazing
  • decide how to make the package managing as convenient as it can be

How will I do it?

This is where I go into what was being discussed today. The answer for the first one is quite debatable. We both had many ideas, but after brainstorming a little and deciding better, we ended up with an amazing solution. Old installation wizard experience.

The installation script will have at first 3 options:

  1. Install all the bears
  2. Install the recommended bears (which will probably include the general ones and a few for, let’s say, Python, C maybe? this is an easy aspect and not so important)
  3. Custom installation

So basically the custom installation will throw a numbered list with all the bears in the terminal interface, and the user will have to input the numbers of bears that he wants. This will probably be the one that will take the most time, but I still think it’s cool, giving the user the liberty of having anything he wants.


For the second question, there’s no optimal solution reached  yet. But we still have a lot of time, right? 13 more days. However, we didn’t want to call it a day without having at least a solution. And there it is:

Package managing will be done by simply updating the requirements for each bear upon the time the requirements are updated. Sure, there may be some bears in worst case scenario that use many. But that is rare. Well, this is a solution after all, and whether it may not be so efficient, there’s still time, and it works, which may be enough for what we need for this project.